Clinician Mistrust in Patients: A Survey of Primary and Urgent Care Clinicians in Colorado
Friday, October 24, 2025
8:00 AM - 9:00 AM Pacific Time
Location: C125-126
Eric Campbell – Center for Bioethics and Humanities – University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine; Christine Baugh – Center for Bioethics and Humanities – University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine; Matthew DeCamp – Center for Bioethics and Humanities – University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine; Lauren Taylor – Department of Population Health – New York University Grossman School of Medicine; Lindsey Fish – Department of General Internal Medicine – Denver Health and Hospital Authority; Matthew Wynia – Center for Bioethics and Humanities – University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine
Professional Research Assistant University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine Aurora, Colorado
Abstract: A robust literature exists on patient mistrust of clinicians, but only a few studies have examined clinician mistrust of patients. We surveyed all clinicians practicing at outpatient primary and urgent care clinics in a university health system and a safety net health system in Colorado (response rate 62.8%) to examine the nature, extent, and factors associated with clinicians’ mistrust in patients. Overall, 29.5% of clinicians reported “Sometimes,” “Often,” or “Always” mistrusting one of their patients; 65.0% reported that it was “Sometimes,” “Often,” or “Always” ethical for clinicians to mistrust their patients; and 42.9% felt mistrusting patients was “To a great extent” or “To some extent” a part of good medical practice. In a multivariable model, practicing in a safety net setting (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.03–4.25, p=0.04) and feeling burned out (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.02–6.48, p=0.05) were associated with higher odds of mistrusting patients, while spending less than 50% of professional time in clinical care was associated with significantly lower odds of mistrust (OR 0.20, 95 CI% 0.05–0.62, p=0.01). Among societal factors, the opioid crisis (73.0%) was most frequently viewed as contributing to clinician mistrust in patients, followed by political extremism (55.6%), patients using social media to criticize clinicians (55.2%), the litigious nature of the US (55.1%), and the COVID-19 pandemic (32.1%). Our findings provide insight into the clinician perspective of mistrust in patient-clinician relationships, highlight the importance of including this perspective, and suggest interventions to improve mutual trust.
Keywords: clinician mistrust, clinician survey
Learning Objectives:
After participating in this conference, attendees should be able to:
At the end of this session, attendees will be able to define trust and mistrust.
At the end of this session, attendees will be able to discuss patient and clinician level factors that impact clinicians' mistrust in their patients.
At the end of this session, attendees will be able to describe organizational factors that can increase trust.