Session: Confidentiality, Privacy, and Conflicts of Interest
Navigating Privacy in Facial Transplantation: Ethical Considerations and Institutional Strategies
Thursday, October 23, 2025
9:00 AM - 10:00 AM Pacific Time
Location: B119
Alexis Gursky – New York University Langone Health; Sachin Chinta – New York University Langone Health; Alay Shah – New York University Langone Health; Bruce Gelb – New York University Langone Health; Eduardo Rodriguez – New York University Langone Health; Laura Kimberly – New York University Langone Health
Postdoctoral Research Fellow New York University Langone Health New York, New York
Abstract: Purpose Over the last 20 years, the novel and highly visible and identifiable nature of facial transplantation (FT) has posed a dual and potentially conflicting obligation for FT programs: to disseminate findings for scientific advancement, while respecting recipients’ preferences for privacy given significant public and media attention. Despite extensive ethical discourse about FT, implications for privacy remain underexplored. Methods This conceptual analysis assesses the ethical implications associated with privacy in FT and offers guidance to FT programs for navigating concerns for donors, recipients, and their families. A literature review which supplements our institutional experience is presented. Results Ethical approaches to privacy require balancing the interests of all stakeholders, including the institution, clinical staff, donor families, and recipients. This process involves ensuring patient understanding that total anonymity may be difficult to achieve and, if it is desired, may be reason not to proceed. Patient centered strategies to address privacy concerns should include comprehensive psychological screening to understand patients’ values and goals for care and detailed informed consent addressing dissemination of information. Public relations support controlling media coverage until the recipient is ready and willing is imperative. Discussion regarding academic publication should also be reviewed. Additional community-based strategies include educational outreach to satisfy public curiosity. Conclusions Our findings suggest that a nuanced, multi-faceted approach is essential to navigate the ethical complexities of privacy in FT. Aligning key stakeholders to support FT recipients’ well-being while maintaining scientific integrity reflects the ethical tension between duties to patients and obligations to advance transplant science.
After participating in this conference, attendees should be able to:
Analyze the ethical tension between research dissemination and patient privacy
Understand the importance of implementing patient-centered strategies to navigate privacy concerns in rare, identifiable medical conditions such as facial transplantation