Medical Student Wake Forest University School of Medicine Winston Salem, North Carolina
Abstract: As the opioid epidemic persists in the US, the incidence of substance use disorder (SUD) and, consequently, infective endocarditis (IE) from injection drug use continues to rise. Despite advancements in treating IE, patients with SUD often face stigma and systemic barriers that influence clinical decision-making. Concerns surrounding treatment adherence, resource allocation, and relapse risk can lead to care restrictions that are not typically imposed on other patient populations.
While harm reduction strategies—such as medication-assisted treatment and safe use initiatives—can complement care, they often encounter resistance outside of addiction medicine and public health. Clinicians may struggle with the tension between reducing immediate harm and concerns about enabling risky behaviors, while some argue that harm reduction undermines recovery aspirations.
Emerging neuroscience also challenges traditional notions of patient autonomy and accountability, complicating the justification for patient contracts and treatment conditions. If SUD impairs volitional control, to what extent should patients be held responsible for their behavior? Should this shift our ethical framework for informed consent and treatment eligibility in the management of IE?
This presentation will explore these tensions, using case examples, addressing: (1) social justice and fairness, including how bias and structural inequities shape treatment access and clinical decision-making; (2) harm reduction and its role in patient-centered care; and (3) questions of responsibility, the use of patient contracts, and the implications of a biological model of addiction. These considerations will inform recommendations for improving care for patients with SUD and IE.
Keywords: substance use disorder, infective endocarditis, fairness
Learning Objectives:
After participating in this conference, attendees should be able to:
Understand the impact of structural inequities and social justice considerations on clinical decision-making and access to care for patients with SUD and IE.
Analyze the ethical implications of harm reduction strategies in the management of SUD, exploring tensions between patient autonomy, treatment adherence, and public health goals.
Evaluate the role of emerging neuroscience in reshaping views on patient responsibility, autonomy, and informed consent in treating patients with SUD and IE.